Herman van rompuy antichrist

Later career [ edit ]. Other activities [ edit ]. Corporate boards [ edit ]. Educational institutions [ edit ]. Non-profit organizations [ edit ]. Honours [ edit ]. Belgian honours Belgium [ edit ]. Foreign honours [ edit ]. Honorary citizenships [ edit ]. Academic honorary degrees [ edit ]. Awards [ edit ]. References [ edit ]. Retrieved 30 October Sky News.

Archived from the original on 22 November Retrieved 20 November Archived from the original on 15 May Retrieved 1 December European Council. Retrieved 6 January Archived from the original on 2 March Retrieved 6 October Archived from the original on 15 March Retrieved 22 March College of Europe. De Morgen in Dutch. De Persgroep Publishing. Retrieved 23 November Archived from the original on 3 September Retrieved 11 January Archived from the original PDF on 26 August Retrieved 4 January Archived from the original on 15 December Archived from the original on 14 November Retrieved 18 January Retrieved 29 September Retrieved 26 February Today's Zaman.

Archived from the original on 12 December Retrieved 18 December Archived from the original on 23 February Retrieved 13 January Retrieved 9 January Retrieved 21 November Archived from the original on 13 December Retrieved 14 May Archived from the original on 25 January Retrieved 27 April Afghanistan: The London Conference. Archived from the original on 29 May Retrieved 28 November Retrieved 28 February The Baltic Course.

Foundation of the International Charlemagne Prize of Aachen. Archived from the herman van rompuy antichrist on 16 December Retrieved 16 December Archived from the original on 3 February Retrieved 19 January Retrieved 2 March Retrieved 28 March Archived from the original on 16 September Retrieved 6 September Retrieved on 2 December Archived from the original PDF on 16 September Archived from the original on 17 September External links [ edit ].

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Herman Van Rompuy. Welcome back, Monarchist. Marcfrans defined what he meant by democracy, which is what conservative Americans mean by democracy: self-government by the people through institutions whose power is limited by the checks and balances and the individual rights enshrined in a written constitution.

What Marcfrans and most Americans mean by democracy is a mixed government with important democratic elements. To be more precise in your criticism, you might consider how the democratic elements undermine the integrity of such systems, rather than attack such systems as a whole, which are largely designed to check and control the democratic elements.

There is an interesting portrait of monarchy in Sienkiewicz's With Fire and Sword on which you might like to comment. The monarchy permits the near destruction of the country in order to destroy a potential rival. Only the hair's breadth awakening of the king himself at the very end prevents the disaster from being complete. Blueglasnost, that reminds me of the election of Sarkozy a couple of years ago.

Herman van rompuy antichrist: Fulfillment of this prophecy will

Those who excitedly cheered his election as the triumph of Classical Liberalism over Socialism were in for a big disappointment. No need for a Lisbon Treaty, really; national politics has been dead for years. The only difference is that we now have it on paper. Our national parliaments are overrated theatres run by a powerful class of bureaucrats who, in true Bilderberg fashion, have made it their primary goal to keep the ignorant masses under the illusion that the people are determining the course of the nation, while the real power brokers are gradually implementing their own grand vision of that which they consider to be a New and Improved Europe.

As for your question, I do not see the EU as an opportunity at all. It would not be befitting of conservatives to force our ideas upon society as the European Union has been doing. Remember, society is organic. You don't 'correct' the wrongs in society overnight. In fact, the whole point of Conservatism is that you cannot create a perfect society.

You can only hold on to or return to certain foundational truths, traditions, virtues and principles, for the sake of liberty and order, while accepting that perfect harmony will never exist. I do not believe we can really reverse all damage that has been done to people's minds. I think all we could do is reveal the true nature of the beast by stripping off its fancy clothing and pointing out that the policies and philosophy of the PC elite under the banner of progress, have been detrimental to the well-being of society.

History, I think, is the herman van rompuy antichrist. History is the one thing that we cannot change and that we can allow to speak for itself. State-funded education is the main tool by which the current elite is trying to brainwash citizens from the cradle so as to make sure they do not dare question the need for European unification, and modern societal 'values'.

Modern-day History classes in the West are probably the clearest example of the PC quasi-dictatorship's infiltration. If true conservatives ever make up the majority of Europeans, we need to set the record straight and reform education, and history classes especially. Not by presenting our own selection of history as the PC elite does, but by allowing people to see the whole picture again so that people can learn to [re]appreciate and be proud of their own roots and culture, while breaking free from the utopian and self-loathing delusions that they have grown up with.

People are fallen by nature and inclined to evil. If only people would recognize this truth and escape from the delusional fantasy world they are living in. They'd certainly be in for a rude awakening though. Thank you for your reply, it was highly interesting. As I said, the thoughts I wrote down are but wishful thinking, I am a fierce opponent of the whole EU behemoth whose tendencies towards authoritarianism are extremely worrisome.

Of course, I agree with what you say.

Herman van rompuy antichrist: Herman van Rompuy is

I only wanted to find whether everyone was like-minded on BJ. Sarkozy is an adequate example of that. Mr Van Rompuy is another one; if he ended up corrupt, although he began as a conservative, we ought to assume that could befall anyone else. I most definitely concur on your piece about history, I truly was frightened as I attended a 'constitutional law' course about the EU it sounded strange from the very beginning, the EU being no state, it is hard to imagine it is supposed to have been bestowed upon a constitutionand the professor announced with a mile-wide grin that it was a lovely idea to teach 'European' history.

We all know such a thing does not exist and would be a pure construct, developments were different in all European countries, on several occasions the destinies of two countries met and their history is definitely intermingled, but still distinct. The aim is obviously to use such 'teachings' as propaganda in order to fuel the EU's much besmirched image.

As you said, that would amount to brainwashing. This should be no wonder since we all know the EU has been doing its best to suppress everything that obstructed its sprawling. Its so-called anti-discrimination legislation being the herman van rompuy antichrist piece in my humble opinion. I agree any conservative recovery must begin with teaching true history and all the facets thereof.

Rest assured I am not delusional enough as to believe the EU can be reformed, let alone that it must endure. Monarchist: it all depends on what you define as 'conservative', if you are seeking for a majority of Burkean conservatives, I am fairly certain your quest is doomed, which is quite unfortunate to me as I consider myself as a Burkean. On the other hand, there may be some enduring conservative majorities in parts of the USA or Australia, 'conservative' corresponding to a certain attachment to free markets, individual liberty, small government, Christian values, established institutions though not the PC ones and tradition.

I confess I cannot think of any European countries with a majority of genuine conservatives, those who go under that name being typical 'centre-right' softies e. However, there is some hope as far as Britain is concerned, the Britons being far more reluctant to yield over their station as a sovereign nation which has been much battered over the past few yearsbreaking off with the EU could rekindle some old instincts, and light up the flame of conservatism again.

The next general election will be a yardstick in many respects. UKIP is gathering momentum and support as we speak, and could very well wreck Mr Cameron's efforts and thus pave the way for a renewal within the Conservative Party should it fail to enter 10, Downing Street. There is none for France, as far as I am concerned, I consider my country as lost.

I'm sorry for my belated reply. I entirely agree with what you wrote and I sympathise with your doubts as to the future of your country. In my view, European history is a misnomer because it implies that the nations founded by Europeans far away from the mother continent somehow have nothing to do with Europe. As far as I am concerned, I am a Fleming and a Westerner.

That is not to say I deny being European and that there are differences between Europe and non-European Western nations, but the idea of a strictly European civilization, I think, is problematic given the enormous internal differences over the course of the history of the European continent, as well as the significant influence of pre-Islamic Middle Eastern and North African or Mediterranean peoples in shaping Western civilization.

Turkey is said to be geographically European, while Armenia is generally considered not to be European. Yet Armenia is by all means more of a Western nation to my mind than Asia Minor has been since it was invaded by the Seljuk Turks. Despite all the wars that were waged against the Ottoman invaders, they would now have us believe that Turkey belongs to our i.

I think it is just absurd. It has been remedied. By the way, I quite agree with your depiction of a Western civilisation stretching far beyond the sole European Continent. Countries such as Australia are much more willing to defend themselves and assume their Western identity than many a country belonging to the European "cradle". It is no great news, is it not?

Herman van rompuy antichrist: " Herman Van Rompuy, the

The attack, which stunned the chamber, came as Mr Van Rompuy made his maiden appearance in parliament in Brussels. I'd never heard of you, nobody in Europe had ever heard of you," Mr Farage thundered, as noisy disapproval at his intervention in the chamber rose. Mr Farage - known for his outspoken interventions - did, however, admit that he thought Mr Van Rompuy was "competent and capable", adding that this made him "dangerous".

It has 13 representatives in the European parliament. Mr Van Rompuy, 62, was chosen unanimously by the governments of the EU's 27 member states to take on the role of the first permanent European Council president. Described as camera-shy and sometimes given the nickname the "grey mouse", he is seen as a coalition builder, credited for steering linguistically divided Belgium out of crisis.

In a typically low-key response to the comments, Mr Van Rompuy said: "There was one contribution that I can only hold in contempt, but I'm not going to comment further. Most Popular Now 56, people are reading stories on the site right now. BBC News Updated every minute of every day.